Utah Supreme Court to Hear GRAMA Case on AG Investigation into Ogden Political Group
Contact: Dan Schroeder, 801-393-4603, dvs1444@gmail.com
David Reymann, Parr Brown Gee & Loveless, 801-257-7939, dreymann@parrbrown.com
The Utah Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in a four-year-long dispute over records of the Attorney General’s criminal investigation of Envision Ogden, a mysterious political group formed in 2007.
Envision Ogden was organized in early 2007, ostensibly to promote economic development and recreation in Ogden. The group quickly raised over $87,000 in donations, much of it from businesses and other organizations including banks, hospitals, the Ogden-Weber Chamber of Commerce, and the Governor’s Office of Economic Development. Then-mayor Matthew Godfrey solicited most of the major contributions to the group.
Unknown to the donors, however, Envision Ogden then funneled most of its net revenue--over $30,000--to political candidates and to the Utah Republican Party. Over $20,000 of these funds went to two Godfrey-supported city council candidates, who reported that they received the funds not from Envision Ogden but from an even more mysterious, unregistered entity called Friends of Northern Utah Real Estate. Envision Ogden further concealed its political nature by failing to register as a 527 political organization with the IRS until 2008, after its fundraising activities had ceased. (The name “Envision Ogden” may also have been intended to deceive donors, some of whom confused the group with Envision Utah, an unrelated nonprofit organization that promotes long-term urban planning.)
When Envision Ogden’s political nature was discovered in 2009, the Attorney General’s Office and the State Bureau of Investigation opened a criminal investigation into possible felony violations including communications fraud and money laundering. However, the investigation stalled for nearly two years until it was finally closed in March 2011, around the time that the statute of limitations would have expired. No criminal charges were ever filed in the case. Although an investigator interviewed several of Envision Ogden’s donors, there is no evidence that investigators ever contacted Mayor Godfrey or any of the political candidates who received funds from Envision Ogden.
As soon as the investigation was closed, Ogden activist and blogger Dan Schroeder filed a request for the Attorney General’s investigation records, under Utah’s Government Records Access Management Act (GRAMA). The AG responded by providing some records including a two-page report and several email messages sent among its staff, but withheld other records--most notably a collection of financial documents that it had obtained via subpoena from Envision Ogden’s bank.
Schroeder appealed the AG’s decision to withhold the bank records and a few others, and won a partial victory at the State Records Committee in August 2011. Both Schroeder and the AG then appealed this decision to Third District Court, where in October 2012 Judge Keith Kelly ruled in favor of the AG’s decision to withhold the records. Schroeder, now represented by attorneys at Parr Brown Gee & Loveless, then appealed Judge Kelly’s decision to the Utah Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in this case at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, April 1, in the Matheson Courthouse, 450 South State Street, 5th Floor, in Salt Lake City.
The principal legal question before the court is whether GRAMA requires the government to disclose financial records obtained via subpoena in the course of a criminal investigation, even when none of GRAMA’s specific exemptions apply to those records. GRAMA does exempt many records from disclosure, for instance, when disclosure would constitute a clear violation of an individual’s privacy, or when a business would be put at a competitive disadvantage through disclosure of its financial records, or when disclosure would compromise an ongoing investigation. In this case, however, the investigation is over, while the financial records are those of a defunct political organization that has not made any privacy claim and that was already required by federal law to disclose its major financial transactions. The Attorney General argues that the Utah Constitution broadly protects the privacy of financial records even in such cases. Schroeder and his attorneys argue that the constitutional requirement was met when the Attorney General obtained the records through a valid subpoena, and that GRAMA provides no applicable exemptions in this case.
Besides the legal issues, this court's decision in this case will determine how much the public will ever learn about Envision Ogden and the Attorney General's investigation. Although the content of the withheld records is unknown, it is likely that they would shed further light on Envision Ogden's financial transactions, including transactions with the mysterious Friends of Northern Utah Real Estate. The records would also show what information the Attorney General's office had in hand when the decision was made to close the investigation without filing charges.
Copies of the legal briefs filed with the Supreme Court in this case are attached.
Sunday, March 15, 2015
Thursday, November 06, 2014
2014 General Election Module
- 2014 Weber County General Election Candidate Roster
- 2014 Ballot "Propositions"
- 2014 Election Debates
- Utah League of Women Voters Guide
- Utah Voter Information Packet
- Utah Voter Information Website
- Weber County Elections Home Page
- Weber County Forum General Election Articles
- General Election Countdown Clock:
- WCF Candidate Endorsements:

Tuesday, October 07, 2014
Libertarian Candidate Craig Bowden Responses
Question:
Members of Congress are regarded so poorly by the public. Time-share
salesmen are probably looked at more favorably. Is that a fair
assessment overall, and why are you an exception to that?
I
would have to say that this is a very accurate statement. Let’s
look at a couple facts: members of both the Democrat and Republican
Parties are known to “flip flop” their positions based on who is
in the majority at the time and also in regards to who is in the
White House. The easiest example is in regards debt ceiling
increases. When President Bush was in office, the Republicans
supported increases and Democrats opposed them. Now that President
Obama is in office, it has reversed.
There
are no principles in Washington, D.C. right now. We have two parties
that constantly change their position to gain favor, votes, or what
happens to be politically expedient for them at the time.
I
am not tied down to one of these two parties, and the agenda I have
isn’t Democrat or Republican solutions to follow a platform, but
solutions that work for all Americans. I’m also not beholden to any
special interest groups. Both Congressman Bishop and Donna McAleer
have their donor base, and going through their reports shows where
their bias exists. I avoid the appearance of evil by refusing to
take money from anyone other than a single voter and the Libertarian
Party of Utah.
Question:
Is the state or the federal government more competent to make
decisions on Utah’s public lands, and why?
Let
me answer with a question, if you will. Why doesn’t the federal
government believe that the people of Utah are competent to decide
what to do with the land?
The
fact is that Utah has some of the smartest people I’ve met. I’ve
gone and talked to thousands of voters throughout Northern Utah, and
I have met some of the most informed people in regards to the issues
at hand in our nation. We are innovators, entrepreneurs, and have
some of the best universities in America.
Congressman
Bishop wants control of Utah lands to be in Utah hands, and I am
inclined to agree. Donna McAleer is wanting control to be handled by
a group of people a few thousand miles away, not connected to the
issues that uniquely face Utah. I will always give the benefit of
the doubt to the people who live in an area.
And
let me state that the voters fully understand that we have to protect
much of the land to preserve our tourism industry. That is one of
the biggest economic factors in Utah, so to think that we are just
going to strip mine and drill the place into oblivion is an ill
informed position.
Question:
Should teachers be allowed to carry arms in schools, and if not, what
are some strong methods to protect our students?
I
believe if they receive training on how to use a firearm, they should
be able to carry. Currently, I do feel the standard for a teacher to
carry in the classroom is far too low. All you really need is a
concealed carry permit to be able to legally carry in a school.
I
think a common sense approach would be for tactical training groups
to teach the teachers how to properly respond to an active shooting
situation. There are already groups who have offered such classes
free of charge to teachers and faculty members, and I feel that it
should be expanded as a requirement for the teacher to carry.
Ultimately,
we are talking about the safety of children, and heaven forbid
something like Sandy Hook happen at Ben Lomond High School or Lincoln
Elementary. We protect just about everything with some sort of an
armed presence, and our children are the key to the future. We
should push for this training so the teacher knows how to properly
respond.
Question:
The recession is over, but there is a feeling of economic insecurity
among the middle class. Adjusted for inflation, the median wage is
the same as in 1989. What needs to be done to boost econmic security,
particularly for the middle class and new college students?
I
would argue that the recession really isn’t over, just a little
better. It’s time to look at a cold, hard reality; the government
has stuck its fingers where they don’t belong and it has prolonged
the stagnation of the economy.
If
you really want to have a booming economy, you have to get the
government to stop interfering. We need to take a hard look at the
regulations that impact business. Most big businesses can implement
just about any change the federal government wants, but those small
businesses are regulated out of business because it becomes too
costly to comply with the demands.
We
also need to take a real look at the tax code. I worked at the IRS
in the business division for three years, and I am going to tell you
that businesses are suffering in a very real way to stay afloat. If
you aren’t a Walmart, Exxon, or other big business, you are on the
verge of going out of business. I witnessed it with my own eyes.
My
solution is to get rid of all forms of taxation and replace it with
the Fair Tax. This is a point of purchase, or consumption tax on all
new goods. This of course would exclude things like food, since that
is a requirement to live, but all discretionary spending would have a
sales tax (so to speak) placed on it.
This
puts more power in the wallet of the person and ensures that the poor
and middle class are not affected since the necessities are not
taxed, but they keep 100% of what they earn. The more frugal you are,
the more money you have.
Question:
As we embark on what looks like another long chapter in the War on
Terror, what will Hill’s role be? Do you feel that you can
represent the base well and protect it from Base Realignment and
Closure (BRAC) elimination and cuts?
Before
I address Hill Air Force Base’s role, I would like to state my
opposition to what is happening in Iraq and Syria. I have been one
of the “boots on the ground” as a Marine Corps infantryman and
seen what American foreign policy leads to when we start intervening
around the globe. The results are not pretty. I have been there
when innocent people are caught in the crossfire and I lost twenty
three men I served with in Iraq, only so that we can go back again?
It’s absurd and it’s time we realize that we cannot get involved
every time something happens around the world.
Now,
as for Hill, since we are involved, obviously we are going to be the
hub for the new F-22, which has successfully been involved in combat
missions in Iraq and Syria in recent weeks. Since the Congress and
President decided we are going to be involved in the conflict, Hill’s
mission becomes very critical at this point to ensure our pilots have
well maintained aircraft that accomplish the mission and get them
back home to see their families.
As
a veteran from the ground side of a military campaign, I know how
important air support is, and Hill has one of the best groups in the
armed forces. When you are pinned down by enemy fighters, those F-16s
coming in are a lifesaver. Every member on Hill, civilian and Air
Force, are vital to national security and making sure we get our
beans, bullets, bandages and air support.
Question:
Are you satisfied with current efforts to improve air quality in our
state? If so, why, and if not, what do we need to do to improve it?
I
am not satisfied with efforts the state has been making. I have an
asthmatic step son and it is the same routine every winter: we will
end up at the hospital several times for him to get breathing
treatments.
Now,
Congressman Bishop would like to blame it solely on geography, and to
an extent, it is true. The basin does trap a lot of pollution, but
we need to address the causes of that pollution to ensure people can
breathe better.
Now,
federally, there isn’t much more we can do. There are EPA
regulations that are supposed to be followed, and I would have to
assume that they are enforced. So what more can be done? I do have
one thing I would like to do that would help lessen the impact, and
it is in regards to federal buildings.
I
would like to see every building the federal government uses in Utah
fitted with solar paneling so that they produce more of their own
electricity. I would also like to see a change on the lights in
federal buildings. When I worked security at the Junction in Ogden,
I would regularly see the IRS buildings and federal office building
on 25th
street. I worked graveyards and regularly saw lights remain on my
entire shift, long after the last employees would leave. This causes
unneeded electricity to be used, which not only impacts our air, but
the wallets of the taxpayers. It’s real easy on that one: turn off
the lights.
Question:
If elected to Congress what could you do to improve education in
Utah?
Education
is so important, because our children literally are the future of our
nation. What they learn today will impact our tomorrow. How do we
address the future? By getting out of the way. We have spent so much
time focusing on teaching children to pass a test (for money for the
school) that we have stopped teaching them how to think, and instead
teach them what to answer. This practice needs to stop.
We
also need to stop having teachers be assessed by those tests. I have
seen amazing teachers in my life step beyond the test and truly teach
children, only to be chastised by the administration because that
class didn’t deliver the results for more grant money. I’ve seen
the opposite hold true as well, where teachers who only teach to the
test are rewarded for essentially holding our children back.
We
also need to have school districts be able to get rid of bad
teachers. My brother told me a story of one of his teachers that
essentially just handed a packet to the class and had them read on
their own. No teaching, just reading a packet. That is not a
teacher, and someone like that should be fired. On the flip side of
this coin, good teachers need to be recognized often and publicly so
they get the credit they deserve.
Finally,
we need to address the problem of parental involvement with the
student. A teacher can only do so much. Parents really need to step
up and be involved with their kids. I think once the economy
improves and one parent can again be home with the kids, things will
get better, so the economy really ties into this since in many cases
both parents work.
Question:
If the case is accepted, how should the U.S. Supreme Court rule on
Utah’s gay-marriage ban?
The
Supreme Court really has no business being involved. Neither does any
level or branch of government. The only role for government is
contract enforcement when there is a harmed party. Two people
signing a contract that they will take care of one another,
regardless of their sexual preference, should have no government
influence unless there is a breach of that contract like cheating,
abuse, etc.
We
cannot bar consenting adults from forming a contract that would allow
for them to have protections given married individuals. It’s time
for the argument of who gets to define marriage to be left up to the
people, but no one gets to restrict a union.
Question:
What would you ask your opponents?
Congressman
Bishop: I would ask him why he only became fiscally responsible after
President Bush left. I mean, when you go back to his beginning of
holding office, he marched lock step with the Republican Party,
getting a dismal rating of 44% by the New American. Now all of a
sudden he’s the Tea Party, fiscal conservative champion? Sorry,
but I have a longer term memory.
Donna
McAleer: I would ask her what she honestly would do different than
towing the same talking points offered by countless Democrats that
have added to the gridlock and partisan politics in Washington, D.C.,
because as of now, I haven’t seen anything that counters what
Democrats already do.
Dwayne
Vance: I’d ask him why he think we need another lawyer in
Washington, D.C. It’s already infested with lawyers. We need more
people of diverse career paths.
Friday, August 22, 2014
2014 Weber County General Election Candidate Roster (Updated 10/30/14)
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rob Bishop | Rob Bishop Campaign Website | Rob Bishop 2014 | Republican |
| Craig Bowden | Craig Bowden Campaign Website | Craig Bowden 2014 | Libertarian |
| Donna McAleer | Donna McAleer Campaign Website | Donna McAleer 2014 | Democratic |
| Dwayne A. Vance | Dwayne A. Vance Campaign Website | No Report Found | Independent American |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leslie D. Curtis | Leslie D. Curtis Campaign Website | Leslie D. Curtis 2014 | Independent American |
| Gregory G. Hansen | Gregory G. Hansen Campaign Website | Gregory G. Hansen 2014 | Constitution |
| Andrew McCullough | Andrew McCullough Campaign Website | Andrew McCullough 2014 | Libertarian |
| Sean Reyes | Sean Reyes Campaign Website | Sean Reyes 2014 | Republican |
| Charles A. Stormont | Charles A. Stormont Campaign Website | Charles A. Stormont 2014 | Democratic |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Millner | Ann Milner Campaign Website | Ann Milner 2014 | Republican |
| Mat Wenzel | Mat Wenzel Campaign website | Mat Wenzel 2014 | Democratic |
| Dwight Steffner | Dwight Steffner Campaign Website | Dwight Steffner 2014 | Libertarian |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roger S. Condie | Roger S. Condie Campaign Website | Roger S. Condie 2014 | Libertarian |
| Justin Fawson | Justin Fawson Campaign Website | Justin Fawson 2014 | Republican |
| Camille L. Neider | Camille L. Neider Campaign Website | Camille L. Neider 2014 | Democratic |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gage Froerer | Gage Froerer Campaign Website | Gage Froerer 2014 | Republican |
| John H. Thompson | John H. Thompson Campaign Website | John H. Thompson 2014 | Democratic |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Olsen | Steve Olsen Campaign Website | Steve Olsen 2014 | Democratic |
| Jeremy Peterson | Jeremy Peterson Campaign Website | Jeremy Peterson 2014 | Republican |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eric D. Irvine | Eric D. Irvine Campaign Website | Eric D. Irvine 2014 | Democratic |
| Dixon M. Pitcher | None Found | Dixon M. Pitcher 2014 | Republican |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Dee | Brad Dee Campaign Website | Brad Dee 2014 | Republican |
| Amy Steed Morgan | Amy Steed Morgan Campaign Website | Amy Steed Morgan 2014 | Democratic |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph Marrero | Joseph Marrero Campaign Website | Joseph Marrero 2014 | Democratic |
| Mike Schultz | Mike Schultz Campaign Website | Mike Schultz 2014 | Republican |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lee Perry | Lee Perry Campaign Website | Lee Perry 2014 | Republican |
| Alan Yorgason | Alan Yorgason Campaign Website | Alan Yorgason 2014 | Democratic |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Ulibarri (Unopposed) | Weber County Profile | John Uliberry October 2014 | Republican |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Allred (Unopposed) | Chris Allred Campaign Website | Chris Allred October 2014 | Republican |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neil Aaron Hansen | None Found | Neil A. Hansen October 2014 | Democratic |
| Ricky Hatch | Weber County Web Profile | Ricky Hatch October 2014 | Republican |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| James Ebert (Unopposed) | None Found | James Ebert October 2014 | Republican |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kerry Gibson (Unopposed) | Weber County Web Profile | Kerry Gibson October 2014 | Republican |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leann Kilts (Unopposed) | Leann Kilts Campaign Website | Leann Kilts June 2014 Leann Kilts October 2014 | Republican |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terry L. Thompson (Unopposed) | Weber County Web Profile | Terry L. Thompson October 2014 | Republican |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures | Party |
|---|---|---|---|
| John B. Bond | None Found | John B. Bond October 2014 | Republican |
| Jared B. Erickson | Jared B. Erickson Campaign Website | Jared B. Erickson October 2014 | Democratic |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures |
|---|---|---|
| David L. Clark | None Found | David L. Clark 2014 |
| Terryl Warner | State School Board Member Bio | Terryl Warner 2014 |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures |
|---|---|---|
| Willard Z. Maughan | None Found | Willard Z. Maughan 2014 |
| Spencer F. Stokes | None Found | Spencer F. Stokes 2014 |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures |
|---|---|---|
| Douglas B. Barker | Douglas B. Barker Campaign Website | Douglas B. Barker October 2014 |
| Steven L. Marker* | None Found | Steven L Marker October 2014 |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures |
|---|---|---|
| Dori Stauffer Mosher | Dori Stauffer Mosher Campaign Website | Dori S. Mosher October 2014 |
| Jeffrey Heiner* | None Found | Jeffrey Heiner October 2014 |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron G. Garza | None Found | Aaron G. Garza October 2014 |
| Joyce J. Wilson* | None Found | Joyce J, Wilson October 2014 |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures |
|---|---|---|
| Dean L. Oborn (Unopposed) | None Found | Dean L. Oborn October 2014 |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures |
|---|---|---|
| Mitsuko Mitzi Kawaguchi (Unopposed) | None Found | Mitsuko Kawagaki October 2014 |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures |
|---|---|---|
| John W. Bradley | None Found | John W. Bradley June 2014 John W. Bradly October 2104 |
| Brent W. Richardson | None Found | Brent W. Richardson June 2014 Brent w. Richardson October 2014 |
| Declaration of Candidacy | Website/Contact Info | Campaign Finance Disclosures |
|---|---|---|
| Janis Christensen | None Found | Janis Christensen October 2014 |
| Scott L. Hansen | None Found | Scott L. Hansen October 2014 |
| 2014 Judicial Retention Reports |
|---|
| Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission Reports for Weber County |
| 2014 Description and Analysis |
|---|
| Constitutional Amendment A |
| Constitutional Amendment B |
| Constitutional Amendment C |
| Weber County Proposition 1 |
Monday, June 23, 2014
2014 Primary Election - Weber County School Board, District 3 - John W. Bradley
Candidate Declaration: John W. Bradley
Email: john.fundaze@hotmail.com
Phone: 801-476-8229
Campaign Website: None
Campaign Blog: None
Facebook: None
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: June 2014
Weber County Forum keyword references: John W. Bradley
News and other publicly available information:
Our View: A final race to the polls
Email: john.fundaze@hotmail.com
Phone: 801-476-8229
Campaign Website: None
Campaign Blog: None
Facebook: None
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: June 2014
Weber County Forum keyword references: John W. Bradley
News and other publicly available information:
Our View: A final race to the polls
2014 Primary Election - Weber School Board District 3 - Brent W. Richardson
Candidate Declaration: Brent W. Richardson
Email: brentrichardson@gmail.com
Phone: 801-725-6949, 801-479-4103
Campaign Website: None
Campaign Blog: None
Facebook: None
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: June 2014
Weber County Forum keyword references: Brent Richardson
News and other publicly available information:
Our View: A final race to the polls
Email: brentrichardson@gmail.com
Phone: 801-725-6949, 801-479-4103
Campaign Website: None
Campaign Blog: None
Facebook: None
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: June 2014
Weber County Forum keyword references: Brent Richardson
News and other publicly available information:
Our View: A final race to the polls
2014 Primary Election - Weber County School Board District 3 - Steven C. Elsnab
Candidate Declaration: Steven C. Elsnab
Email: wsdbelsnab@yahoo.com
Phone: 801-479-3186
Campaign Website: None
Campaign Blog: None
Facebook: None
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: None
Weber County Forum keyword references: None
News and other publicly available information:
Our View: A final race to the polls
Email: wsdbelsnab@yahoo.com
Phone: 801-479-3186
Campaign Website: None
Campaign Blog: None
Facebook: None
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: None
Weber County Forum keyword references: None
News and other publicly available information:
Our View: A final race to the polls
2014 Primary Election - Weber County Recorder/Surveyer - Ernest Rowley
Candidate Declaration: Ernest Rowley
Email: Ernest.Rowley@hotmail.com
Phone: 801-985-3918
Campaign Website: None
Campaign Blog: Ernest Rowley
Facebook: Ernest Rowley
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: 6/16/14
Weber County Forum keyword references: Ernest Rowley
News and other publicly available information:
Video intensifies Weber Recorder/Surveyor campaign
Our View: A final race to the polls
Email: Ernest.Rowley@hotmail.com
Phone: 801-985-3918
Campaign Website: None
Campaign Blog: Ernest Rowley
Facebook: Ernest Rowley
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: 6/16/14
Weber County Forum keyword references: Ernest Rowley
News and other publicly available information:
Video intensifies Weber Recorder/Surveyor campaign
Our View: A final race to the polls
2014 Primary Election - Weber County Recorder/Surveyer - Leann Kilts
Candidate Declaration: Leann Kilts
Email: LeeannKilts@gmail.com
Phone: 801-644-0938
Campaign Website: None
Campaign Blog: Leann Kilts
Facebook: Leann Kilts
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: 6/17/14
Weber County Forum keyword references: Leann Kilts
News and other publicly available information:
Video intensifies Weber Recorder/Surveyor campaign
Our View: A final race to the polls
Email: LeeannKilts@gmail.com
Phone: 801-644-0938
Campaign Website: None
Campaign Blog: Leann Kilts
Facebook: Leann Kilts
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: 6/17/14
Weber County Forum keyword references: Leann Kilts
News and other publicly available information:
Video intensifies Weber Recorder/Surveyor campaign
Our View: A final race to the polls
2014 Primary Election - Utah House of Representatives District 7 - Dan Deuel
Candidate Declaration: Dan Deuel
Email: dan@dandeuel.com
Phone: 801-876-3668
Campaign Website: Elect Dan Deuel District 7
Campaign Blog: None
Facebook: Dan Deuel for Utah State House - District 7
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: Dan Deuel
Weber County Forum keyword references: Dan Deuel
News and other publicly available information:
Similar views: GOP House District 7 candidates
Our View: A final race to the polls
Email: dan@dandeuel.com
Phone: 801-876-3668
Campaign Website: Elect Dan Deuel District 7
Campaign Blog: None
Facebook: Dan Deuel for Utah State House - District 7
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: Dan Deuel
Weber County Forum keyword references: Dan Deuel
News and other publicly available information:
Similar views: GOP House District 7 candidates
Our View: A final race to the polls
2014 Primary Election - Utah House of Representatives District 7 - Justin Fawson
Candidate Declaration: Justin Fawson
Email: vote@justinfawson.com
Phone: 801-781-0016
Campaign Website: Justin Fawson House District 7
Campaign Blog: None
Facebook: Justin Fawson House District 7
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: Justin Fawson
Weber County Forum keyword references: Justin Fawson
News and other publicly available information:
Similar views: GOP House District 7 candidates
Our View: A final race to the polls
Email: vote@justinfawson.com
Phone: 801-781-0016
Campaign Website: Justin Fawson House District 7
Campaign Blog: None
Facebook: Justin Fawson House District 7
Twitter: None
Other: None
Financial Disclosures: Justin Fawson
Weber County Forum keyword references: Justin Fawson
News and other publicly available information:
Similar views: GOP House District 7 candidates
Our View: A final race to the polls
Sunday, June 22, 2014
Weber County 2014 Primary Election Roster
![]() |
| Click to Enlarge Image |
Utah House of Representatives
Justin Fawson
Dan Deuel
Weber County Recorder/Surveyor
Leeann Kilts
Ernest Rowley
Weber County School Board, District 3
Steven C. Elsnab
Brent W. Richardson
John W. Bradley
Monday, December 09, 2013
Weber County GOP State Central Committee Members
| County | Office | F_Name | L_Name | Phone | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weber | County Chair | Noall | Knighton | 801-476-3488 | noall@comcast.net | |
| Weber | County Vice Chair | Christie | Moore | 801.510.6634 | chrisim001@aol.com | |
| Weber | SCC Rep | Elizabeth | Carlin | 801-627-0729 | buzytwo@netzero.net | |
| Weber | SCC Rep | Dale | Bennion | 801.814.8275 | benniondale@hotmail.com | |
| Weber | SCC Rep | James | Ebert | 801.710.0788 | jamesebert1@hotmail.com | |
| Weber | SCC Rep | Bruce | Anderson | 801.731.7713 | bruceanderson314@yahoo.com | |
| Weber | SCC Rep | Lynda | Pipkin | 801-791-6998 | healthywealthynwise@gmail.com | |
| Weber | SCC Rep | Jill | Koford | 801--721-3588 | jill@kofordusa.com | |
| Weber | SCC Rep | Jennifer | Evans | 801-391-4142 | evansje723@yahoo.com |
Monday, November 25, 2013
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Riverdale City Recorder Ember Herrick Standard-Examiner Comment
The Standard Examiner published incomplete information in their article on November 8, 2013 titled “Riverdale race still in limbo” that I feel the need to clarify as Riverdale’s Election Official. According to Weber County’s Election Office there are still 443 absentee ballots and 42 provisional ballots to be counted for a total of 485 votes. Riverdale’s unofficial election results show Council contenders Brent Ellis with 711 votes, Gary Griffiths with 504 votes, Cody Hansen with 463 votes and Steve Hilton with 457 votes. Simple arithmetic shows Riverdale’s race is still in limbo with 970 potential Council votes that still need to be tallied. Using vote by mail Riverdale’s turnout was 47%, a record high for voter participation.
The other point in the article that I would like to clarify is regarding the fact that one of Riverdale’s City Council candidates Gary Griffiths did not meet the financial disclosure deadline of 5 p.m. October 28, 2013 all the candidates agreed to in a signed acknowledgement when they filed for office in June 2013. The agreement clearly stated that "failure to file reports even if accumulated totals are $0 by the dates listed will cause the City Recorder to disqualify and effectively remove the candidate's name from the ballot." The other five candidates submitted their financial disclosures by the October 28, 2013 5 p.m. deadline but Mr. Griffiths came into my office on the morning of October 29, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. and explained that it was his 25th wedding anniversary the day before and he forgot to submit his financial disclosure by the deadline he had agreed to. Mr. Griffiths said he had received my email and letter sent via USPS reminding him of the deadline and the consequences for non-compliance including disqualification and having his name removed from the ballot but said he "just spaced it". I told him that I would consult with our city attorney and the Lt. Governor’s office and let him know whether or not his name would be removed from the upcoming election ballot.
As Riverdale's Election Official I created the City's Election Guide in January 2013 with all of the forms our candidates are required to complete and all deadlines they are required to meet. Based on my interpretation of state law that financial disclosure are due "seven days before the regular general election date" I set the deadline as Monday, October 28, 2013. Went I went to the Lt. Governor's website it only stated the deadline should be "seven days before the regular general election" and did not say if that was October 28th or 29th. I consider Tuesday October 29th seven days until the general election date of November 5, 2013, not seven days before. The October 28th deadline was also recognized by the Utah Municipal Clerks Association on their 2013 Election Checklist created January 8, 2013 and so that was the date I used. I would also note that none of the candidates challenged or attempted to correct the deadlines I had set until Mr. Griffiths missed the October 28, 2013 deadline.
I conferred with Riverdale City Attorney Steve Brooks and he agreed with me that Mr. Griffiths had missed the deadline and that the appropriate interpretation of “seven days before the general election” was Monday, October 28th at 5 p.m. I then contacted the Lieutenant Governor’s office and in a conference call Mr. Brooks and I spoke with the Deputy Director of Elections Justin Lee who told us that state law does not make determinations about removing candidates from ballots in municipal elections, it is up to the individual cities. When Mr. Brooks explained to Mr. Lee why we had set the deadline as October 28th he said his office has a financial disclosure deadline for Political Action Committees (PAC) in Utah of seven days before the general election and that they consider the deadline to be October 29, 2013. Mr. Brooks asked him to put that in writing and Mr. Lee sent the following email to us on October 29, 2013: “Our office has interpreted 7 days before the election to fall today, October 29 for municipal financial disclosures (Utah Code 10-3-208). As you can see from our statewide disclosures website there is a report due 7 days before the municipal general election for PACs (20A-11-602) and that report is due today, October 29 http://www.disclosures.utah.go.... Please note that this is not legal advice, but the opinion and interpretation of our office.”
In an effort to let the voters decide who their city council members will be and in deference to the interpretation of the Lt. Governor’s office of the October 29, 2013 disclosure deadline Riverdale’s City Attorney Steve Brooks contacted Mr. Griffiths and let him know that although he had missed the reporting deadline he agreed to abide by when he filed as a candidate, the city would not be removing his name from the election ballot because he did submit his disclosure by the state’s interpretation of the deadline 5 p.m. October 29, 2013. Mr. Brooks did warn Mr. Griffiths that if any of the other five candidates who met the October 28, 2013 disclosure deadline set by the city wanted to challenge Mr. Griffith’s name being left on the ballot, a judge would make the final determination.
Riverdale City Recorder Ember Herrick
Source: Ember Herrick Comment; Financial disclosure deadline confusion prompts questions in Riverdale election -Standard-Examiner 11/8/13
The other point in the article that I would like to clarify is regarding the fact that one of Riverdale’s City Council candidates Gary Griffiths did not meet the financial disclosure deadline of 5 p.m. October 28, 2013 all the candidates agreed to in a signed acknowledgement when they filed for office in June 2013. The agreement clearly stated that "failure to file reports even if accumulated totals are $0 by the dates listed will cause the City Recorder to disqualify and effectively remove the candidate's name from the ballot." The other five candidates submitted their financial disclosures by the October 28, 2013 5 p.m. deadline but Mr. Griffiths came into my office on the morning of October 29, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. and explained that it was his 25th wedding anniversary the day before and he forgot to submit his financial disclosure by the deadline he had agreed to. Mr. Griffiths said he had received my email and letter sent via USPS reminding him of the deadline and the consequences for non-compliance including disqualification and having his name removed from the ballot but said he "just spaced it". I told him that I would consult with our city attorney and the Lt. Governor’s office and let him know whether or not his name would be removed from the upcoming election ballot.
As Riverdale's Election Official I created the City's Election Guide in January 2013 with all of the forms our candidates are required to complete and all deadlines they are required to meet. Based on my interpretation of state law that financial disclosure are due "seven days before the regular general election date" I set the deadline as Monday, October 28, 2013. Went I went to the Lt. Governor's website it only stated the deadline should be "seven days before the regular general election" and did not say if that was October 28th or 29th. I consider Tuesday October 29th seven days until the general election date of November 5, 2013, not seven days before. The October 28th deadline was also recognized by the Utah Municipal Clerks Association on their 2013 Election Checklist created January 8, 2013 and so that was the date I used. I would also note that none of the candidates challenged or attempted to correct the deadlines I had set until Mr. Griffiths missed the October 28, 2013 deadline.
I conferred with Riverdale City Attorney Steve Brooks and he agreed with me that Mr. Griffiths had missed the deadline and that the appropriate interpretation of “seven days before the general election” was Monday, October 28th at 5 p.m. I then contacted the Lieutenant Governor’s office and in a conference call Mr. Brooks and I spoke with the Deputy Director of Elections Justin Lee who told us that state law does not make determinations about removing candidates from ballots in municipal elections, it is up to the individual cities. When Mr. Brooks explained to Mr. Lee why we had set the deadline as October 28th he said his office has a financial disclosure deadline for Political Action Committees (PAC) in Utah of seven days before the general election and that they consider the deadline to be October 29, 2013. Mr. Brooks asked him to put that in writing and Mr. Lee sent the following email to us on October 29, 2013: “Our office has interpreted 7 days before the election to fall today, October 29 for municipal financial disclosures (Utah Code 10-3-208). As you can see from our statewide disclosures website there is a report due 7 days before the municipal general election for PACs (20A-11-602) and that report is due today, October 29 http://www.disclosures.utah.go.... Please note that this is not legal advice, but the opinion and interpretation of our office.”
In an effort to let the voters decide who their city council members will be and in deference to the interpretation of the Lt. Governor’s office of the October 29, 2013 disclosure deadline Riverdale’s City Attorney Steve Brooks contacted Mr. Griffiths and let him know that although he had missed the reporting deadline he agreed to abide by when he filed as a candidate, the city would not be removing his name from the election ballot because he did submit his disclosure by the state’s interpretation of the deadline 5 p.m. October 29, 2013. Mr. Brooks did warn Mr. Griffiths that if any of the other five candidates who met the October 28, 2013 disclosure deadline set by the city wanted to challenge Mr. Griffith’s name being left on the ballot, a judge would make the final determination.
Riverdale City Recorder Ember Herrick
Source: Ember Herrick Comment; Financial disclosure deadline confusion prompts questions in Riverdale election -Standard-Examiner 11/8/13
Sunday, October 13, 2013
City Weekly - The Swallow Files
The Swallow Files, a series of online and print stories examining notes, observations and overlooked elements of the ongoing Swallow scandal as the Legislature begins its lengthy investigation into the attorney general’s fitness as a public servant:
- Indicted Poker-Payment Processor Speaks Out on Johnson, Swallow - Part 1
- Telemarketing Employees Told in '12 to Stop Mentioning Swallow - Part 2
- John Swallow's Untraceable Campaign-Money Cards - Part 3
- The Backup Candidate - Part 4
- Five Unanswered Questions About Swallow's Chaperone Program - Part 5
- E-mails Raise Questions About AG Investigation of UTA Development - Part 6
- Six Degrees of "Fixer" Tim Lawson to Utah's Attorneys General - Part 7
- Political 'Fixer' Tim Lawson Wants to Be Lt. Governor - Part 8
- If Swallow Is Found Legal But Unethical, Will Lawmakers Impeach? - Part 9
- How Would Things Be Different If Utah's AG Were Appointed? - Part 10
- AGs Blame Records Delay on Shutdown; Committee Disagrees - Part 11
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
LEAKED: The Internet Must Go
Published on Sep 8, 2013
In 2012, I was dispatched to help the big ISPs to figure out how to sell their vision for a "faster," "cleaner" internet. Six months later I produced this report -- and leaked it to the world. Learn more and take action: www.theinternetmustgo.com.
Also, I'm looking for a job -- any leads would be appreciated, thank you.
Also, I'm looking for a job -- any leads would be appreciated, thank you.
- John Wooley
"We owe John Wooley a debt of gratitude for leaking this market research. Originally intended for internal purposes only, it has finally found its most important audience." -John Wooley's Mom
Tuesday, September 03, 2013
Daniel Olsen August 29, 2013 Email
From: Olsen, Daniel
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:15 PM
To: mbeyer@standard.net
Cc: Hatch,Ricky; Gibson,Kerry; Bell, Matt; Zogmaister, Jan M.
Subject: Inaccuracies in your article on Summit Mtn and Weber County
Mikayla,
Your story in today’s paper on Summit Mountain and Weber County’s special assessment arrangement has several inaccuracies that lead the reader to believe the County is paying a portion of the bonds on behalf of Summit.
Specifically, your article quotes me as saying, “We borrowed enough money so that Weber County can make the bond payments for the first two years” (emphasis added). I would never say such a thing because it’s not true.
Again you write, “In other words, the county, not Summit, will be making payments of just over $1.5 million for the next few years.” This sentence is completely false. Weber County is NOT paying any portion of the bond, nor would we have ever agreed to do so. You seem to have misunderstood how “capitalized interest” and “special assessments” work, so let me try again.
The first two years of bond payments come from cash that was included in the bond amount. So, of the $17.6 million bond, we put approximately $3 million into an account where it will be drawn down as bond payments come due during the first two years. Summit is then responsible for approximately $1.5 million in bond payments for the next 18 years. If we had not utilized “capitalized interest,” the bond would have been smaller, approximately $14.5 million, and Summit’s annual debt payment would have been about $1.2 million over 20 years. Either way, Summit pays the whole thing, and the County doesn’t pay a dime on the bonds.
Also, further in the article you state “the special assessment district will levy taxes within a 1,570 acre development” (emphasis added). Special assessments are NOT “taxes,” they are “assessments,” as defined in Utah Code Title 11 Chapter 42, and they are commonly used by other local governments in Utah. Under state law, the property owners, not the local governments, are responsible for repaying any debt incurred on behalf of those property owners.
What’s most disappointing to me is that the tone of your article implies the County has been lying to the public all along about this project. The County has been above-board about everything related to this project from the beginning. Your implications that anyone at Weber County would purposely try to deceive the public is deeply offensive.
I hope you will continue to report about issues facing Weber County, and I’m happy to answer your questions. But I also hope that in the future you will spend more time understanding the issues before you publish your articles.
Sincerely,
Dan
Dan Olsen
Comptroller | Weber County
2380 Washington Blvd Ste. 320 | Ogden UT 84401
801-399-8487 | dolsen@co.weber.ut.us | www.co.weber.ut.us
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:15 PM
To: mbeyer@standard.net
Cc: Hatch,Ricky; Gibson,Kerry; Bell, Matt; Zogmaister, Jan M.
Subject: Inaccuracies in your article on Summit Mtn and Weber County
Mikayla,
Your story in today’s paper on Summit Mountain and Weber County’s special assessment arrangement has several inaccuracies that lead the reader to believe the County is paying a portion of the bonds on behalf of Summit.
Specifically, your article quotes me as saying, “We borrowed enough money so that Weber County can make the bond payments for the first two years” (emphasis added). I would never say such a thing because it’s not true.
Again you write, “In other words, the county, not Summit, will be making payments of just over $1.5 million for the next few years.” This sentence is completely false. Weber County is NOT paying any portion of the bond, nor would we have ever agreed to do so. You seem to have misunderstood how “capitalized interest” and “special assessments” work, so let me try again.
The first two years of bond payments come from cash that was included in the bond amount. So, of the $17.6 million bond, we put approximately $3 million into an account where it will be drawn down as bond payments come due during the first two years. Summit is then responsible for approximately $1.5 million in bond payments for the next 18 years. If we had not utilized “capitalized interest,” the bond would have been smaller, approximately $14.5 million, and Summit’s annual debt payment would have been about $1.2 million over 20 years. Either way, Summit pays the whole thing, and the County doesn’t pay a dime on the bonds.
Also, further in the article you state “the special assessment district will levy taxes within a 1,570 acre development” (emphasis added). Special assessments are NOT “taxes,” they are “assessments,” as defined in Utah Code Title 11 Chapter 42, and they are commonly used by other local governments in Utah. Under state law, the property owners, not the local governments, are responsible for repaying any debt incurred on behalf of those property owners.
What’s most disappointing to me is that the tone of your article implies the County has been lying to the public all along about this project. The County has been above-board about everything related to this project from the beginning. Your implications that anyone at Weber County would purposely try to deceive the public is deeply offensive.
I hope you will continue to report about issues facing Weber County, and I’m happy to answer your questions. But I also hope that in the future you will spend more time understanding the issues before you publish your articles.
Sincerely,
Dan
Dan Olsen
Comptroller | Weber County
2380 Washington Blvd Ste. 320 | Ogden UT 84401
801-399-8487 | dolsen@co.weber.ut.us | www.co.weber.ut.us
Monday, August 26, 2013
WDEC/OSD Document Production Request Data
Original WDEC Document Production Request:
- Kim Irvine Letter 6/12/13
- Brad Smith Letter 8/15/13
- Interlocal Agreement Real Estate 10/27/09
- Interlocal Agreement Mitigation Payments 10/27/09
- RDA Projects Summary Excel Spreadsheet (4 pages)
- Teacher Retention 2007 - 2012
- Preliminary Results Language Arts
- Preliminary Results Math
- Total District Salaries
- Democrats ask school questions - Standard-Examiner 8/22/13
- Weber County democrats demand answers - ABC4 8/23/13
Sunday, August 18, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
© 2005 - 2017 Weber County Forum™ -- All Rights Reserved








